Contributor network
Write for NPHLA
The NPHLA Contributor Network is for practising professionals who want to share expert, source-backed analysis with pharmacy and healthcare peers — under their own name, with editorial support and full transparency.
What contributors do
Expert perspective, editorially supported
Contributors write analysis, explainers and expert commentary on pharmacy practice and regulation, metabolic medicine, medical aesthetics and healthcare technology — the areas NPHLA Intelligence covers. They also propose topics where practising professionals need clear, well-sourced information.
We welcome applications from pharmacists, physicians, medical directors, nurse practitioners, healthcare executives, researchers, pharmacy owners, health-system leaders, medical-aesthetics professionals, regulatory specialists, technology professionals and professional educators — and from other healthcare professionals with relevant expertise.
Apply
Tell us about your background, credentials, expertise and the topics you would like to cover, and declare relevant interests.
Staff review
An editor reviews every application individually and verifies identity and credentials. There are no instant accounts.
Your profile
Approved contributors receive a contributor ID and an author profile — published only after you approve it.
Propose and write
Pitch topics or submit drafts from your contributor dashboard. Every piece passes NPHLA editorial review before publication.
Standards
Contributor standards
Version 2026-10-01
- Your own work. Submit only work you wrote. Tell your editor if you used AI tools at any stage; AI-generated text is never published under a contributor’s name.
- Sources for every factual claim. Link to primary sources — regulators, statutes, peer-reviewed research, official data — wherever possible.
- No individual medical or legal advice. Contributions inform professionals; they do not advise individual patients or replace legal counsel.
- Independence. Contributors are never asked to write favourably about NPHLA, its members or its partners, and are not paid for favourable coverage.
- Patient privacy. Never include information that could identify a patient.
Transparency
Disclosure rules
Contributors declare financial and professional interests relevant to what they write: employers, ownership, advisory and speaking roles, research funding, and relationships with companies whose products or services they discuss. Declarations are made when applying and again with each piece.
Disclosures are shown on the contributor’s profile and with their byline. “None” is a valid answer — but it must be true.
Sponsored content
Paid or sponsored content is always labelled as sponsored. It is never presented as independent editorial work by a contributor.
Editorial review
How pieces are reviewed and credited
Every contribution is reviewed by an NPHLA editor for accuracy, sourcing, balance and clarity. Editors may request changes or decline a piece; being an approved contributor does not guarantee publication.
- Published pieces carry the contributor’s name and credentials, linked to their author profile, with a “Contributor” label.
- Credentials are marked as verified only after staff have checked them, and only while that check is current.
- Briefings drafted with AI assistance are credited to the NPHLA Intelligence desk — never to an individual. A named expert may appear only as the person who reviewed them.
- Corrections are published openly on the piece.
Approved contributors also receive a contributor ID, an optional contributor badge for their own website, and shareable graphics for published Intelligence pieces. See the editorial standards.
Contributors
Current contributors
The first contributors are being reviewed
Contributor profiles appear here once an application has been approved and the contributor has approved their public profile.
Share your expertise
An editor reviews every application individually and will be in touch by email.